Surgical management of cervical spine instability in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients
Authors
Pedro Miguel Marques; Pedro Cacho-Rodrigues; Manuel Ribeiro-Silva; Daniela Linhares ; Pedro Negrão ; Rui Pinto ; Nuno Neves;
Aim: Cross-sectional study that aims to evaluate the results of cervical spine surgeries due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) instability, between January of 2000 and of 2012 in a main Portuguese centre
Methods: Patients followed on Rheumatology submitted to cervical spine fusion due to atlantoaxial (AAI), sub-axial (SAI) or cranio-cervical (CCI) instabilities between 2000-2012 were included. Information about the surgical procedure and associated complications was gathered and imagiologic and clinical indexes before and after surgery (as anterior and posterior atlanto-axial interval and Ranawat index) were evaluated and compared using adequate statistics.
Results: Forty-five patients with RA were included: 25 with AAI, 13 with CCI and 7 with SAI. Ten AAI and 4 CCI patients were submitted to wiring stabilization techniques; 15 AAI and 9 CCI patients to rigid ones; and in all patients with SAI an anterior cervical arthrodesis was chosen. There is a significant increase in PADI and a decrease in AADI in the postoperative evaluation (p<0,05) that only remains significant when rigid systems were used. After surgery the Ranawat index decreased (p<0,05) and no patient showed a deterioration of neurological condition. The complication rate was of 23,1%, with 5 mal-unions.
Conclusion: Surgical management of cervical column instabilities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis seems to be a safe procedure, with a high rate of neurologic improvement. Rigid techniques seem to lead to a better imagiological improvement when compared to wiring ones.
Pedro Miguel Marques
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo – Portugal
Pedro Cacho-Rodrigues
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal
Manuel Ribeiro-Silva
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal; INEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Porto – Portugal
Daniela Linhares
CIDES, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto – Portugal
Pedro Negrão
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal
Rui Pinto
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal
Nuno Neves
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal; INEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Porto – Portugal
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo – Portugal
Pedro Cacho-Rodrigues
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal
Manuel Ribeiro-Silva
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal; INEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Porto – Portugal
Daniela Linhares
CIDES, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto – Portugal
Pedro Negrão
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal
Rui Pinto
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal
Nuno Neves
Serviço de Ortopedia, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto – Portugal; Serviço de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto - Portugal; INEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Porto – Portugal