Barriers and alternatives to pediatric rheumatology referrals: a survey of family doctors and pediatricians in Portugal

Background: Access to pediatric rheumatology (PR) is not well described in Portugal. The main goal of this study was to ascertain barriers to PR referrals and subsequent alternative referral patterns among family doctors and pediatricians. Methods: A web-based survey was e-mailed to family doctors and pediatricians practicing in Portugal, in order to investigate access to PR care issues. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed. Results: Two hundred and ninety-two responses were obtained, 24.7% from pediatricians and 75.3% from family doctors. Only 12% claimed to have had specific education on PR. Nearly 70% worked less than one hour away from a PR center. Twenty eight percent had referred a patient to PR at least once, and 9.3% experienced a situation in which they considered referring to PR but ultimately did not. Many referred to other specialties, primarily pediatrics, adult rheumatology, and pediatric orthopedics. Pediatricians encountered more diversified rheumatic diseases. Fifty five percent had no opinion on PR centers’ support, while 24% found it sufficient. Having specific training on PR, being a pediatrician and a specialist were associated with greater referrals to PR. The most rated measure for PR referrals’ improvement was promoting education. Regional access to PR’s discrepancies were documented. Conclusion: Mainly lack of education on PR, but also uneven national coverage and greater distances to some PR centers were the main barriers to PR referrals, in Portugal. Pediatricians seem to have better education, greater experience and more referrals to PR. The current alternatives for referral are pediatrics, adult rheumatology and pediatric orthopedics. Educational consolidation was the biggest and most rewarding inconsistency to battle against.