Low persistence with oral biphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis
Authors
Carla Torre; José Guerreiro; Zilda Mendes; Ana Miranda; Fátima Bragança; Joaquim Cristino; Helena Canhão; Jaime C Branco;
Background: Osteoporotic fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is recognized that persistence with medication is crucial to reach optimal clinical outcomes. We aimed to estimate the persistence level to weekly and monthly oral bisphosphonates (OBP) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) over 24 months from therapy initiation in a population-based setting.
Methods: Prospective observational cohort study of PMO women ≥50 years initiating OBP recruited through community pharmacies. Data were collected at baseline during face-to-face interviews. Follow-up included pharmacy records (refill dates and medication possession; cohort 1) and telephone-surveys for patients who agreed to be interviewed (cohort 2). Patients were classified as persistent if they refilled their prescription within 30 days after exhausting the time covered by their previous supply. Log-rank tests were used to compare Kaplan-Meier curves of time to non-persistence.
Results: Of 427 women recruited with a mean age of 65.0 years, 380 (89%) agreed to be interviewed (cohort 2). Over 24-months of follow-up, 3.4% (95% CI: [2.0%; 5.6%]) of all subjects were persistent to OBP based on pharmacy records. Analysis combining both self-reported information and pharmacy records (cohort 2) showed a persistence estimate of 20.0% (95% CI: [16.1%; 24.2%]). Lower persistence was associated with more frequent OBP dosing and living alone. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was self-reported adverse events (27.6%).
Conclusions: Results indicate a low level of persistence with OBP. Barriers and reasons leading to discontinuation of anti-PMO therapies should be proactively addressed to promote persistence and improve fracture protection.
Carla Torre
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias; Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade de Lisboa
José Guerreiro
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias
Zilda Mendes
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias
Ana Miranda
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias
Fátima Bragança
Amgen Biofarmacêutica, Lisboa, Portugal
Joaquim Cristino
Amgen Biofarmacêutica, Lisboa, Portugal
Helena Canhão
EpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Jaime C Branco
CEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & Serviço de Reumatologia, CHLO,EPE / Hospital Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias; Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade de Lisboa
José Guerreiro
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias
Zilda Mendes
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias
Ana Miranda
Centro de Estudos e Avaliação em Saúde (CEFAR), Associação Nacional das Farmácias
Fátima Bragança
Amgen Biofarmacêutica, Lisboa, Portugal
Joaquim Cristino
Amgen Biofarmacêutica, Lisboa, Portugal
Helena Canhão
EpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Jaime C Branco
CEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & Serviço de Reumatologia, CHLO,EPE / Hospital Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal